Correction to Commons Written Answer

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (James Plaskitt) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	It has been brought to my attention that the reply I gave the honourable Member for Hornsey and Wood Green, Lynne Featherstone, on 5 June 2008 (Official Report, Commons, col. 1094W) contained incorrect information on the number of incidents of benefit fraud reported to the benefit fraud hotline. I apologise for this oversight.
	The correct Answer should have been:
	Information is not available broken down by benefit type. The available information is in the table.
	
		
			 Benefit Fraud Hotline Reports by Type, Great Britain 
			 Hotline 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 
			 No of calls received 211,054 199,004 211,599 215,924 237,107 
			 Internet Referrals 20,780 32,960 57,543 69,866 78,230 
			 Total 231,834 231,964 269,142 285,790 315,337 
			 Source: National Benefit Fraud Hotline

Crime: Youth Crime Action Plan

Lord West of Spithead: My right honourable Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Jacqui Smith) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The Government have today published the Youth Crime Action Plan, the first ever cross-government plan for dealing with the full range of issues around youth crime. The plan focuses on three key areas: tough enforcement where behaviour is unacceptable or illegal; more non-negotiable support to address the underlying causes of poor behaviour, including more parenting orders and the new youth rehabilitation order. That can require young people to attend education, go to an attendance centre for group work or undertake treatment for drug and substance abuse and better prevention to tackle problems before they become serious or entrenched.
	The plan sets out the Government's aim is to reduce by one-fifth the rate of young people aged 10 to 17 entering the criminal justice system by 2020, and introduces a new national goal to reduce substantially the number of young victims by 2020. The plan builds on the Government's existing investment to support children, young people and families, with almost £100 million available over the next three years under the youth crime action plan for measures to cut youth crime in the short term and prevent it in the long term.
	Copies of the action plan are available in the House Library, the Printed Paper Office and on the Home Office website at www.homeoffiice.gov.uk.

Ministry of Defence: Complex Weapons

Baroness Taylor of Bolton: My right honourable friend the Minister of State for the Armed Forces (Bob Ainsworth) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am pleased to inform the House that the Ministry of Defence has concluded a teaming agreement with the industrial grouping known as Team CW1 to take forward, to the next stage, the Government's intentions for the UK complex weapons sector. This agreement is underpinned by enabling contracts which we have placed with MBDA (UK) Ltd and Thales UK which, with the teaming agreement, will launch the assessment phase for the initiative as a whole and undertake specific concept and assessment work on six complex weapons programmes2.
	The assessment phase will assess further our ability to enter into a partnering arrangement and, through the programme activity, test an innovative way of developing weapons to meet the UK's military requirements, including the use of modularity and families of weapons. The teaming agreement, which has been signed by all of the Team CW partners, including the Ministry of Defence, links the two enabling contracts and formalises the governance arrangements for the duration of the assessment phase.
	If successful, it is expected that the technologies developed to meet these initial military requirements will be adapted to meet the majority of our future weapons needs.
	This approach has the potential to offer a greater level of capability to the front line while achieving value for money for the taxpayer and maintaining UK operational sovereignty over our complex weapons.
	1. Team CW is led by MBDA (UK) Ltd, and includes Thales UK, QinetiQ Ltd, and Roxel (UK Rocket Motors) Ltd. The Ministry of Defence is also a member of Team CW.
	2. The projects are Indirect Fire Precision Attack Loitering Munition (IFPA LM); Future Air-to-Surface Guided Weapon (FASGW); Storm Shadow Capability Enhancement Programme (SSCEP); Selected Precision Effects at Range (SPEAR), and Future Local Area Air Defence Systems (FLAADS).

Pension, Disability and Carers Service

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Pensions Reform (Mike O'Brien) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I am pleased to announce that the 2008-09 business plan for the Pension, Disability and Carers Service, an executive agency of the Department for Work and Pensions, has been published today.
	The annual performance targets for the Pension, Disability and Carers Service in 2008-09 were previously published on 27 March 2008. Further information on these targets is contained within the business plan, copies of which have been placed in the Library.

Prison Service: Medal

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My honourable friend the Minister of State (David Hanson) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Her Majesty the Queen has graciously given her approval for the introduction of a prison long-service and good conduct medal. This medal will be awarded to operational staff in the UK prison services on completion of 20 years of continuous meritorious service and brings operational prison staff in line with other comparable organisations such as the police, fire service, ambulance service and the military, as well as other prison/correctional services within the Commonwealth. Prison officers do a difficult and dangerous job and it is right that they will in future receive public recognition for this vital work.

Public Services Forum

Lord Davies of Oldham: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Secretary at the Cabinet Office (Tom Watson) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	As chair of the Public Services Forum (PSF) I have today placed in the Library of the House a new Joint Statement on Access to Skills, Trade Unions and Advice in Government Contracting developed by the PSF. This joint statement was developed in partnership by Government, trade unions, business and the third sector and its aim is to improve the quality of services delivered under government contracts by raising the skills of employees working on these contracts.
	For the UK to compete in the modern global economy, a world class skills base is needed. Government have set a challenging target to ensure almost all adults (95 per cent) have basic literacy and numeracy skills by 2020. It is important for Government to lead by example in making progress on this agenda, and to provide a framework for social partners to do the same. This joint statement will give many of those who work on government contracts the opportunity to develop their basic skills where needed. This will have benefits for those who use public services, for the individual employee and for the employer.

Railways: Franchise Enforcement Policy

Lord Bassam of Brighton: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Tom Harris) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	The Department for Transport has today published the results from a consultation paper on rail franchise, Enforcement Policy: Rail Franchise Agreements and Closure Conditions. The document summarises the responses received to the consultation document together with the outcomes stated by the department. The policy document details the department's stepped and pragmatic approach to enforcement. It also contains a statement of policy with respect to the imposition of penalties and the determination of their amount, which the department has a legal obligation to consult on.
	The purpose of the publication of the results is to provide transparency to the department's current policy and to ensure that it is easily understood. We acknowledge and welcome the input provided by and the rail industry. It is available on the DfT's website. Copies have been placed in the House Library.

Regional Spatial Strategies

Baroness Andrews: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Parmjit Dhanda) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Communities is today publishing the North East of England Plan, which is the final version of the north-east regional spatial strategy. This is the latest in a series of comprehensive reviews of regional spatial strategies to be completed under the provisions of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
	The plan reflects consideration of responses to the consultations on the Secretary of State's proposed changes and further proposed changes which followed on from the independent examination in public carried out into the draft strategy in 2006.
	The north-east plan replaces the existing regional planning guidance (RPG1) which became the statutory RSS in September 2004, and the submission draft revision to that document called View: Shaping the North East, which was published by the North East Assembly in June 2005.
	Some 130 people and organisations responded to the latest round of consultation which ended on 2 April 2008. Almost 1,300 representations were received with many of them expressions of support.
	Careful consideration has been given to all of these responses and, as is required under appropriate legislation, a sustainability appraisal, a strategic environmental assessment and a habitats regulations assessment have been prepared and updated to help the plan deliver sustainable development.
	The aim of the plan is to guide development in the north-east to 2021 and also to set the direction of travel in the longer term. Key elements of the plan include:
	A requirement for 128,900 net new dwellings to be built between 2004-21 (about 7,600 dwellings per annum). This level of growth can be achieved within RSS previously developed land targets and the overall direction of the strategy which focuses development within the conurbations of the Tyne and Wear and Tees Valley City regions, and includes a rural allocation appropriate to supporting sustainable rural communities.A regional employment land portfolio (of about 3,400 hectares) and a suite of key employment locations which provide sufficient land to enable sustainable economic growth in the region, with appropriate policy criteria to ensure developments address wider sustainability issues including sustainable energy, transport and environmental protection. A table of transport outcomes and related investment and management priorities using information on known commitments and schemes which have a real possibility of progressing.A climate change policy requiring other strategies and plans contribute to meeting national policy as set out in the energy White Paper to put ourselves on a path to cutting the UK's carbon dioxide emissions by some 60 per cent by about 2050, with real progress by 2020.A sustainable energy policy requiring major new developments secure at least 10 per cent of their energy supply from decentralised and renewable or low-carbon sources where feasible and viable, ahead of local planning authorities setting their own targets.Policies for sustainable waste management and minerals aggregates provision.Policies for protecting and enhancing the built and natural environment, on matters including design quality, the historic environment, landscape and bio-diversity.
	The plan represents a step change in addressing housing need in the north-east and goes a long way to achieving what is likely to be required in the longer term to meet the Government's housing Green Paper target.
	Copies of the North East of England Plan and the supporting documents will be available in the Libraries of both Houses, are being sent to the region's MPs and MEPs and will be available in local libraries and local planning authorities. They are also on the GONE website at www.go-ne.gov.uk and can be purchased from The Stationery Office (TSO) either online at www.tsoshop.co.uk or at TSO shops.

Turks and Caicos Islands

Lord Malloch-Brown: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Meg Munn) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	The House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, in its report Overseas Territories, published on 6 July, recommended among other things the appointment of a commission of inquiry into allegations of corruption in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
	I wish to inform the House that on 10 July the Governor of the Turks and Caicos Islands announced the appointment of a commission of inquiry. The commission will inquire into whether there is information that corruption or other serious dishonesty in relation to past and present elected Members of the House of Assembly (previously known as the Legislative Council) may have taken place in recent years. It is to report to the governor within 16 weeks its preliminary findings and recommendations concerning:
	instigating criminal investigations by the police or otherwise;any indications of systemic weaknesses in legislation, regulation and administration; any recommendation that the inquiry's terms of reference be extended; andany other matters relating thereto.
	The commission will be led by the right honourable Sir Robin Auld. He is undertaking a short initial visit to the territory from 13 to 16 July followed by a period of preparation in the UK leading to his main visit to the Turks and Caicos Islands in September/ October. He will submit the preliminary report and recommendations to the governor by 3 November.
	The commission will conduct such parts of its inquiry as it deems appropriate in camera, in the interests of confidentiality. In addition, the Commissions of Inquiry Ordinance provides that anyone who attempts to interfere with this process is liable, on conviction, to a fine, imprisonment, or both. The commission also has powers to summon any person in Turks and Caicos Islands to attend to give evidence.
	In addition, a number of important steps have recently been taken or are currently under way to reduce the scope for corruption and to improve capacity in the Turks and Caicos Islands to deal with it should it occur. These include the establishment of an Integrity Commission, a Human Rights Commission, a Complaints Commissioner, a Ministerial Code, a Public Service Code of Ethics and Integrity and the appointment of a highly experienced Chief Auditor, and the adoption of a comprehensive Proceeds of Crime Ordinance.

Zimbabwe

Lord Malloch-Brown: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Mr. David Miliband) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Since the sham election on 27 June, conditions in Zimbabwe have deteriorated. International agencies estimate that 36,000 people have been displaced internally since the first round in March, at least 103 have been murdered and many thousands have received treatment for the injuries they have been dealt by the security forces. In spite of the promise of the authorities that the ban on their activities was temporary, aid agencies are still denied access to large swathes of the country—a restriction that means that 1.5 million people are still unable to access food aid and vital medicines that they need.
	We have been clear that words are simply not enough and that the international community as a whole must act. We have said openly that Zimbabwe's crisis is one that the world had a responsibility to respond to. That is why we supported the United States in their its to table a resolution at the Security Council and to take that resolution to a vote on 11 July. The draft resolution had the nine votes it needed to pass into law. It was co-sponsored by two African states—Liberia and Sierra Leone. Burkina Faso, an African member of the Council, also voted in favour of it. All European and South American council members and the USA were behind it. That it was vetoed by Russia and China despite this clear and broad majority is something that the ordinary people of Zimbabwe—the victims of that violence and who are denied that food and medicine—will not be able to understand.
	I believe that it is right when you believe in a cause that you should push others to be clear on their attitude to it. That Russia agreed to a G8 statement calling for further measures including precisely the targeted sanctions we were advocating but then—the same week—chose to vote against that resolution is now for it to explain. The terms of the draft UN resolution were widely discussed within the Council. Sufficient opportunity was given to explain reservations and to table amendments. Russia chose not to engage in that debate. China's decision to veto was deeply disappointing, too. We will continue to work with both states to persuade them to take a different course and to use their influence both in Zimbabwe and in the wider region to resolve the crisis.
	The draft resolution did not cut across negotiations that the African Union had advocated in its own conclusions at its summit in Sharm el-Sheik. We believe that dialogue between the parties can provide a way forward for Zimbabwe's crisis. But we need to be clear about the basis on which dialogue can be developed. At present we have one party that won a popular mandate in the parliamentary elections of 29 March but whose members and supporters have been intimidated by the violence unleashed on them by the state and ZANU-PF militia. And we have another party that has refused to cede power and that has used the full force of the state security apparatus to intimidate its citizens and turn the presidential run-off into a farce. To turn this context into one in which credible negotiations might begin, pressure is needed and the threat of an alternative approach that demonstrates what is at stake, personally, for the very people who believe that they have least to gain from engaging in a process leading to democratic reform. That is why we will continue to advocate further targeted sanctions that focus on not just the 14 that would have been affected by the draft UN resolution but those around them and those who depend on them.
	The UN estimates that 5 million people will need food aid in Zimbabwe by the end of 2008 if conditions do not improve. Given the humanitarian situation on the ground, the incalculable hyperinflation and the increasing violence, the end of 2008 may bring a greater catastrophe still, for Zimbabwe and the region, if the international community does not act to prevent it.
	At the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council on 22 July, we will press for EU Foreign Ministers to agree to extend the number of persons on the EU visa ban and asset freeze list, for the first time to target companies and entities owned by such persons, and to tighten further the exemptions which allow Zimbabweans on that list to travel to the EU. This first wave of targeted measures will aim to act as a stimulus on the regime to engage in meaningful dialogue with the opposition. The regime and some of its sympathisers try to portray the "talks about talks" that have occurred in South Africa last week as a breakthrough. We will not regard those talks as a breakthrough until they lead not just to agreements on paper but implemented changes on the ground, and in particular a transitional government that reflect the will of the people as they voted on 29 March. Meanwhile, we shall work with like-minded partners to root out the sources of the regime elite's foreign currency and target their personal wealth. With our partners we shall work with banks and financial institutions to underline the unacceptability of harbouring the cash of those who are directing or profiting from Zimbabwe's meltdown.
	The opposition MDC and their leader Morgan Tsvangirai have been clear that basic preconditions must be met before any real negotiation can begin. Their demands are reasonable: the cessation of violence, the release of political prisoners and the unfettered access of NGOs to the people who need them most and whom the regime has long since forgotten its responsibilities for. The onus now is on the region—the Southern Africa Development Community—and the African Union to demonstrate that they are serious about making dialogue work. We will also continue to advocate the appointment of a UN envoy to support President Mbeki's efforts to negotiate, and to investigate and report on human rights abuses on the ground.
	For the first time, we saw, in the election on 27 June, all three major African election observer groups underline their public dissatisfaction with the vote and the outcome. It is now for Africa and its leaders to show that it will not accept the 27 June result as the basis for any future settlement and that its commitment to democracy and to reform is real. We will support them in that goal. But calls for space and for time for negotiation to work can only be taken seriously when the conditions on the ground are conducive to meaningful dialogue. The current violence makes that impossible. Newly elected MDC MPs today are in hiding in Harare and elsewhere and are afraid to take up their roles. They are right to be afraid, and Africa and its leaders have a responsibility to respond to their concerns and to their constituents' concerns and remove the causes of that fear.
	Robert Mugabe described his election campaign as a war. Morgan Tsvangirai was clear that the people of Zimbabwe did not want to join Mugabe's war. Zimbabwe's independence has been won long ago. No one is challenging its sovereignty or its right to be a nation. Our concern is that its people should have the right to choose who leads it and how it is governed, and that their choice be respected. Our twin-track approach of applying pressure on the regime elite via targeted sanctions and keeping the ordinary people of Zimbabwe alive through our contribution as the second largest bilateral donor of aid will continue. We will continue to meet our responsibilities on both, and we will press others to join us in that approach. The price of not doing so, in terms of the dead and the dying in Zimbabwe, means we have no option but to continue.